29 research outputs found

    Developing predictive models for early detection of at-risk students on distance learning modules

    Get PDF
    Not all students who fail or drop out would have done so if they had been offered help at the right time. This is particularly true on distance learning modules where there is no direct tutor/student contact, but where it has been shown that making contact at the right time can improve a student’s chances. This paper explores the latest work conducted at the Open University, one of Europe’s largest distance learning institutions, to identify when is the optimum time to make student interventions and to develop models to identify the at-risk students in this time frame. This work in progress is taking real time data and feeding it back to module teams as the module is running. Module teams will be indicating which of the predicted at-risk students have received an intervention, and the nature of the intervention

    Investigating students' use of self-assessments in higher education using learning analytics

    Get PDF
    Background Formative assessments are vital for supporting learning and performance but are also considered to increase the workload of teachers. As self-assessments in higher education are increasingly facilitated via digital learning environments allowing to offer direct feedback and tracking students' digital learning behaviour these constraints might be reduced. Yet, learning analytics do not make sufficient use of data on assessments. Aims This exploratory case study uses learning analytics methods for investigating students' engagement with self-assessments and how this relates to performance in the final exam and self-reported self-testing strategies. Materials & Methods The research study has been conducted at a European university in a twelve-weeks course of a Bachelor's program in Economic and Business Education including nenroll = 159 participants. During the semester, students were offered nine self-assessments each including three to eight tasks plus one mid-term and one exam-preparation self-assessment including all prior self-assessments tasks. The self-assessment interaction data for each student included: the results of the last self-assessment attempt, the number of processed self-assessment tasks, and the time spent on the last self-assessment attempt, the total self-assessment attempts, and the first as well as last access of each self-assessment. Data analytics included unsupervised machine learning and process mining approaches. Results Findings indicate that students use the self-assessments predominantly before summative assessments. Two distinct clusters based on engagement with self-assessments could be identified and engagement was positively related to performance in the final exam. The findings from learning analytics data were also indicated by students' self-reported use of self-testing strategies. Discussion With the help of multiple data from self-reports, formal exams, and a learning analytics system, the findings provided multiple perspectives on the use of self-assessments and their relationships with course performance. These findings call for applying assessment analytics and related frameworks in learning analytics as well as providing learners with related adaptive feedback. Conclusion Future research might investigate different (self-report) variables for clustering, other student cohorts or self-assessment forms.Peer Reviewe

    Modelling student online behaviour in a virtual learning environment

    Get PDF
    In recent years, distance education has enjoyed a major boom. Much work at The Open University (OU) has focused on improving retention rates in these modules by providing timely support to students who are at risk of failing the module. In this paper we explore methods for analysing student activity in online virtual learning environment (VLE) -- General Unary Hypotheses Automaton (GUHA) and Markov chain-based analysis -- and we explain how this analysis can be relevant for module tutors and other student support staff. We show that both methods are a valid approach to modelling student activities. An advantage of the Markov chain-based approach is in its graphical output and in the possibility to model time dependencies of the student activities.Comment: In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Learning Analytics and Machine Learning at the 2014 International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 2014

    First-Year Engineering Students’ Strategies for Taking Exams

    Get PDF
    Student drop-out is one of the most critical issues that higher educational institutions face nowadays. The problem is significant for first-year students. These freshmen are especially at risk of failing due to the transition from different educational settings at high school. Thanks to the massive boom of Information and Communication Technologies, universities have started to collect a vast amount of study- and student-related data. Teachers can use the collected information to support students at risk of failing their studies. At the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, the situation is no different, and first-year students are a vulnerable group similar to other institutions. The most critical part of the first year is the first exam period. One of the essential skills the student needs to develop is planning for exams. The presented research aims to explore the exam-taking patterns of first-year students. Data of 361 first-year students have been analysed and used to construct “layered” Markov chain probabilistic graphs. The graphs have revealed interesting behavioural patterns within the groups of successful and unsuccessful students.Peer Reviewe
    corecore